The 5-4 ruling had Justice Anthony Kennedy writing for the majority
with the four liberal justices. Each of the four conservative justices
wrote their own dissent.
The far-reaching decision settles one of the major civil rights fights
of this era — one that has rapidly evolved in the minds of the American
pubic and its leaders, including President Barack Obama. He struggled
publicly with the issue and ultimately embraced same-sex marriage in the
months before his 2012 re-election.
"No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest
ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family," Kennedy
wrote.
"In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than they once were."
In a dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia blasted the Court's "threat to American democracy."
"The substance of today's decree is not of immense personal importance
to me," he wrote. "But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in
today's judicial Putsch."
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the decision had "nothing to do with the Constitution.
"If you are among the many Americans—of whatever sexual orientation—who
favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today's
decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal," he wrote.
"Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a
partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not
celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it."
The U.S. is now the 21st country to legalize same-sex marriage
nationwide. Married same-sex couples will now enjoy the same legal
rights and benefits as married heterosexual couples nationwide and will
be recognized on official documents such as birth and death
certificates.
The decision affirmed growing public support in the U.S. for gay
marriage, with about two-thirds of Americans now in favor. And it comes
as gay rights groups have seen gay marriage bans fall rapidly in recent
years, with the number of states allowing gay marriage swelling most
recently to 37 — that is, until this ruling.
There were two questions before the Court, the first asked whether
states could ban same sex marriage, the second asked whether states had
to recognize lawful marriages performed out of state.
The relevant cases were argued earlier this year. Attorney John Bursch,
serving as Michigan's Special Assistant Attorney General, defended four
states' bans on gay marriage before the Court, arguing that the case
was not about how to define marriage, but rather about who gets to
decide the question.
The case came before the Supreme Court after several lower courts
overturned state bans on gay marriage. A federal appeals court had
previously ruled in favor of the state bans, with Judge Jeffrey Sutton
of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals writing a majority opinion in
line with the rationale that the issue should be decided through the
political process, not the courts.
Fourteen couples and two widowers challenged the bans. Attorneys Mary
Bonauto and Doug Hallward-Driemeier presented their case before the
Court, arguing that the freedom to marry is a fundamental right for all
people and should not be left to popular vote.
Three years after Obama first voiced his support for gay couples' right
to marry, his administration supported the same sex couples at the
Supreme Court.
"Gay and lesbian people are equal," Solicitor General Donald B.
Verrilli Jr. told the justices at the oral arguments earlier this year.
"It is simply untenable — untenable — to suggest that they can be denied
the right of equal participation in an institution of marriage, or that
they can be required to wait until the majority decides that it is
ready to treat gay and lesbian people as equals.
The same-sex couples who challenged gay marriage bans in Michigan,
Tennessee, Kentucky and Ohio were just a few of the estimated 650,000
same-sex couples in the United States, 125,000 of whom are raising
children.
The challenges included same-sex couples who wanted to marry, those who
sought to have their lawful out-of-state marriage recognized, as well
as those who wanted to amend a birth or death certificate with their
marriage status.
The lead plaintiff in the case is Jim Obergefell who married his spouse John Arthur in 2013 months before Arthur died.
The couple, who lived in Ohio, had to travel to Maryland aboard a
medical jet to get married when Arthur became gravely ill. And when
Arthur died, Obergefell began to fight to be recognized as Arthur's
spouse on his death certificate.
The plaintiffs from Michigan are April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse, two
Detroit-area nurses who are also foster parents. They took to the courts
after they took in four special-needs newborns who were either
abandoned or surrendered at birth, but could not jointly adopt the
children because Michigan's adoption code requires that couples be
married to adopt.
Sgt. Ijpe Dekoe and Thomas Kostura became plaintiffs in the gay marriage case after they moved to Tennessee from New York.
The pair had married in New York in 2011, but Dekoe's position in the
Army took the couple to Tennessee, which banned gay marriage and refused
to recognize gay marriages performed in other states.-CNN
